<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Insite Law Reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:55:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='insitelawreports.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Insite Law Reports" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Crime:  Regina v Gilham [2009] EWCA Crim 2293; [2009] WLR (D) 324  CA: Stanley Burnton LJ, Penry-Davey, Sharpe JJ: 9 Nov 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/crime-regina-v-gilham-2009-ewca-crim-2293-2009-wlr-d-324-ca-stanley-burnton-lj-penry-davey-sharpe-jj-9-nov-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/crime-regina-v-gilham-2009-ewca-crim-2293-2009-wlr-d-324-ca-stanley-burnton-lj-penry-davey-sharpe-jj-9-nov-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina v Gilham [2009] EWCA Crim 2293; [2009] WLR (D) 324 CA: Stanley Burnton LJ, Penry-Davey, Sharpe JJ: 9 Nov 2009 CRIME — Copyright — Infringement — Sale of devices enabling the playing on games consoles of games copied in breach of copyright — Whether copying of the whole or a substantial part of a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=211&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACrim/R_v_Gilham.html" target="_blank">Regina v Gilham [2009] EWCA Crim 2293; [2009] WLR (D) 324 </a></p>
<p>CA: Stanley Burnton LJ, Penry-Davey, Sharpe JJ:<br />
9 Nov 2009</p>
<div><em>CRIME — Copyright — Infringement —  Sale of devices enabling the playing on games consoles of games copied in breach of copyright — Whether copying of the whole or a substantial part of a copyright work proved — Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, ss 1, 16, 17, 296ZB and 296ZF</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/211/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=211&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/crime-regina-v-gilham-2009-ewca-crim-2293-2009-wlr-d-324-ca-stanley-burnton-lj-penry-davey-sharpe-jj-9-nov-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Company:  In re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) (No 2) [2009[ EWCA Civ 1161; [2009] WLR (D) 323  CA: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Longmore, Patten LJJ: 6 November 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/company-in-re-lehman-brothers-international-europe-in-administration-no-2-2009-ewca-civ-1161-2009-wlr-d-323-ca-lord-neuberger-of-abbotsbury-mr-longmore-patten-ljj-6-november-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/company-in-re-lehman-brothers-international-europe-in-administration-no-2-2009-ewca-civ-1161-2009-wlr-d-323-ca-lord-neuberger-of-abbotsbury-mr-longmore-patten-ljj-6-november-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) (No 2) [2009[ EWCA Civ 1161; [2009] WLR (D) 323 CA: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Longmore, Patten LJJ: 6 November 2009 COMPANY — Scheme of arrangement — Sanction of court — Company in administration — Administrators proposing scheme of arrangement involving distribution of property held by [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=209&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/Inre_LehumanBrothers2.html" target="_blank">In re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) (No 2) [2009[ EWCA Civ 1161; [2009] WLR (D) 323 </a></p>
<p>CA: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Longmore, Patten LJJ:<br />
6 November 2009</p>
<div><em>COMPANY —  Scheme of arrangement —  Sanction of court  — Company in administration —  Administrators proposing scheme of arrangement involving distribution of property held by company on trust  — Whether scheme dealing with proprietary claims “a compromise or arrangement” between company and its creditors or any class of them —  Whether within jurisdiction of court to sanction proposed scheme —  Companies Act 2006, ss 895, 899</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/209/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=209&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/company-in-re-lehman-brothers-international-europe-in-administration-no-2-2009-ewca-civ-1161-2009-wlr-d-323-ca-lord-neuberger-of-abbotsbury-mr-longmore-patten-ljj-6-november-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insolvency:  Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd and another v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and another Butters and others (joint administrators of WW Realisation 8 Ltd and another) v BBC Worldwide Ltd and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1160; [2009] WLR (D) 322  CA: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Longmore, Patten LJJ: 6 November 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/insolvency-perpetual-trustee-co-ltd-and-another-v-bny-corporate-trustee-services-ltd-and-another-butters-and-others-joint-administrators-of-ww-realisation-8-ltd-and-another-v-bbc-worldwide-ltd-and/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/insolvency-perpetual-trustee-co-ltd-and-another-v-bny-corporate-trustee-services-ltd-and-another-butters-and-others-joint-administrators-of-ww-realisation-8-ltd-and-another-v-bbc-worldwide-ltd-and/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insolvency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd and another v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and another Butters and others (joint administrators of WW Realisation 8 Ltd and another) v BBC Worldwide Ltd and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1160; [2009] WLR (D) 322 CA: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Longmore, Patten LJJ: 6 November 2009 INSOLVENCY — Winding [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=207&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/PerpetualTrustee_v_BNY.html" target="_blank">Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd and another v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and another Butters and others (joint administrators of WW Realisation 8 Ltd and another) v BBC Worldwide Ltd and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1160; [2009] WLR (D) 322 </a></p>
<p>CA: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Longmore, Patten LJJ:<br />
6 November 2009</p>
<div><em>INSOLVENCY —  Winding up —  Anti-deprivation rule —  Contractual provisions switching priority and changing allocation of costs on insolvency —  Determination of licence agreement and option to acquire shares on insolvency —  Whether provisions contrary to principle that insolvent’s assets available for distribution among creditors —  Whether valid</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/207/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=207&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/insolvency-perpetual-trustee-co-ltd-and-another-v-bny-corporate-trustee-services-ltd-and-another-butters-and-others-joint-administrators-of-ww-realisation-8-ltd-and-another-v-bbc-worldwide-ltd-and/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negligence:  Sienkiewicz (administratrix of the estate of Enid Costello decd) v Greif (UK) Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1159; [2009] WLR (D) 321  CA: Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR, Scott Baker and Smith LJJ: 6 November 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/negligence-sienkiewicz-administratrix-of-the-estate-of-enid-costello-decd-v-greif-uk-ltd-2009-ewca-civ-1159-2009-wlr-d-321-ca-lord-clarke-of-stone-cum-ebony-mr-scott-baker-and-smith-lj/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/negligence-sienkiewicz-administratrix-of-the-estate-of-enid-costello-decd-v-greif-uk-ltd-2009-ewca-civ-1159-2009-wlr-d-321-ca-lord-clarke-of-stone-cum-ebony-mr-scott-baker-and-smith-lj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Negligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sienkiewicz (administratrix of the estate of Enid Costello decd) v Greif (UK) Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1159; [2009] WLR (D) 321 CA: Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR, Scott Baker and Smith LJJ: 6 November 2009 NEGLIGENCE — Causation — Asbestos exposure — Claimant developing mesothelioma after occupational and environmental exposure to asbestos dust — Whether [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=205&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/Sienkiewicz_v_Greif.html" target="_blank">Sienkiewicz (administratrix of the estate of Enid Costello decd) v Greif (UK) Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1159; [2009] WLR (D) 321 </a><br />
CA: Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony MR, Scott Baker and Smith LJJ:<br />
6 November 2009</p>
<div><em>NEGLIGENCE — Causation — Asbestos exposure — Claimant developing mesothelioma after occupational and environmental exposure to asbestos dust  — Whether claimant to establish occupational rather than environmental exposure was probable cause of disease  —  Whether sufficient for claimant to show material contribution to risk of developing disease made by occupational exposure — Compensation Act 2006, s 3</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/205/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=205&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/negligence-sienkiewicz-administratrix-of-the-estate-of-enid-costello-decd-v-greif-uk-ltd-2009-ewca-civ-1159-2009-wlr-d-321-ca-lord-clarke-of-stone-cum-ebony-mr-scott-baker-and-smith-lj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fair Trading:  Heath v Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1135; [2009] WLR (D) 320  CA: Waller, Dyson, Lloyd LJJ: 5 November 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/fair-trading-heath-v-southern-pacific-mortgage-ltd-2009-ewca-civ-1135-2009-wlr-d-320-ca-waller-dyson-lloyd-ljj-5-november-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/fair-trading-heath-v-southern-pacific-mortgage-ltd-2009-ewca-civ-1135-2009-wlr-d-320-ca-waller-dyson-lloyd-ljj-5-november-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heath v Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1135; [2009] WLR (D) 320 CA: Waller, Dyson, Lloyd LJJ: 5 November 2009 FAIR TRADING — Consumer credit — Agreement — Mortgage agreement between claimant mortgagee and defendant discharging prior mortgage from advance and using remainder for own purposes — Defendant contending mortgage constituting “multiple agreement” [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=203&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/Heath_v_SouthernPacific.html" target="_blank">Heath v Southern Pacific Mortgage Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1135; [2009] WLR (D) 320 </a></p>
<p>CA: Waller, Dyson, Lloyd LJJ:<br />
5 November 2009</p>
<div><em>FAIR TRADING  — Consumer credit —  Agreement — Mortgage agreement between claimant mortgagee and defendant discharging prior mortgage from advance and using remainder for own purposes — Defendant contending mortgage constituting “multiple agreement” in two “parts” providing restricted-use and unrestricted-use credit —  Whether mortgage in two categories forming separate consumer credit agreements —  Whether enforceable —  Consumer Credit Act 1974 (c 39), s 18</em></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/203/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=203&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/fair-trading-heath-v-southern-pacific-mortgage-ltd-2009-ewca-civ-1135-2009-wlr-d-320-ca-waller-dyson-lloyd-ljj-5-november-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local Government:  Regina (Manchester City Council) v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council [2009] WLR (D) 319  CA: Sir Anthony May P, Scott Baker, Lloyd LJJ: 6 Nov 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/local-government-regina-manchester-city-council-v-st-helens-metropolitan-borough-council-2009-wlr-d-319-ca-sir-anthony-may-p-scott-baker-lloyd-ljj-6-nov-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/local-government-regina-manchester-city-council-v-st-helens-metropolitan-borough-council-2009-wlr-d-319-ca-sir-anthony-may-p-scott-baker-lloyd-ljj-6-nov-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (Manchester City Council) v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council [2009] WLR (D) 319 CA: Sir Anthony May P, Scott Baker, Lloyd LJJ: 6 Nov 2009 LOCAL GOVERNMENT — Community Care services — Persons in need of care and attention — Local authority funding care package for person ordinarily resident in its area — Person [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=201&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACrim/R(Manchester)_v_StHelensMBC.html" target="_blank">Regina (Manchester City Council) v St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council [2009] WLR (D) 319 </a></p>
<p>CA: Sir Anthony May P, Scott Baker, Lloyd LJJ:<br />
6 Nov 2009</p>
<div><em>LOCAL GOVERNMENT  —  Community Care services —  Persons in need of care and attention —  Local authority funding care package for person ordinarily resident in its area —  Person ceasing to be soy resident —  Authority continue to fund package —  Whether entitled to stop funding —  Whether authority in whose area person had become ordinarily resident liable to fund package — National Assistance Act 1948,, s29(1) (as amended by Local Government Act 1972, s 195(6), Sch 23 para 2(4)2 and Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1960, s 113, Sch. 4) —  National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990, s 47</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/201/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=201&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/local-government-regina-manchester-city-council-v-st-helens-metropolitan-borough-council-2009-wlr-d-319-ca-sir-anthony-may-p-scott-baker-lloyd-ljj-6-nov-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU Law:  Regina (Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd) v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [2009] EWHC 2722 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 318  QBD: Blake J: 6 November 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/eu-law-regina-bristol-myers-squibb-pharmaceuticals-ltd-v-national-institute-for-health-and-clinical-excellence-2009-ewhc-2722-admin-2009-wlr-d-318-qbd-blake-j-6-november-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/eu-law-regina-bristol-myers-squibb-pharmaceuticals-ltd-v-national-institute-for-health-and-clinical-excellence-2009-ewhc-2722-admin-2009-wlr-d-318-qbd-blake-j-6-november-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EU Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd) v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [2009] EWHC 2722 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 318 QBD: Blake J: 6 November 2009 EUROPEAN COMMUNITY — Council Directive — Implementation — United Kingdom notifying European Commission of criteria used in single technology appraisal scheme — More detailed scheme subsequently adopted — [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=199&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/QBD/R(Bristol-Myers)_v_NIHCE.html" target="_blank">Regina (Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd) v National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence [2009] EWHC 2722 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 318 </a></p>
<p>QBD: Blake J:<br />
6 November 2009</p>
<div><em>EUROPEAN COMMUNITY —  Council Directive —  Implementation —  United Kingdom notifying European Commission of criteria used in single technology appraisal scheme —  More detailed scheme subsequently adopted — Single technology appraisal of cost effectiveness of manufacturer’s drug carried out taking into account manufacturer’s figures and figures produced by independent review body based on modifications to manufacturer’s model on cost effectiveness —  Guidance issued with negative recommendation —  Whether United Kingdom obliged to notify commission of detailed scheme —  Whether duty to act fairly when carrying out appraisal —  Whether failure to disclose modified model breach of duty to act fairly —  Council Directive 89/105/EEC, art 6 —  Directions and Consolidating Directions to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2005, para 2(1)(a)</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/199/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=199&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/eu-law-regina-bristol-myers-squibb-pharmaceuticals-ltd-v-national-institute-for-health-and-clinical-excellence-2009-ewhc-2722-admin-2009-wlr-d-318-qbd-blake-j-6-november-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Police:  Scopelight Ltd and others v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police Force and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1156; [2009] WLR (D) 317  CA: Ward, Wilson, Leveson LJJ: 5 November 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/police-scopelight-ltd-and-others-v-chief-constable-of-northumbria-police-force-and-another-2009-ewca-civ-1156-2009-wlr-d-317-ca-ward-wilson-leveson-ljj-5-november-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/police-scopelight-ltd-and-others-v-chief-constable-of-northumbria-police-force-and-another-2009-ewca-civ-1156-2009-wlr-d-317-ca-ward-wilson-leveson-ljj-5-november-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Police Powers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scopelight Ltd and others v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police Force and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1156; [2009] WLR (D) 317 CA: Ward, Wilson, Leveson LJJ: 5 November 2009 &#160; POLICE — Powers — Retention of seized property — Police investigating criminal proceedings and seizing and retaining property — Whether entitled to retain seized property [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=197&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/Scopelight_v_ChiefConstable.html" target="_blank">Scopelight Ltd and others v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police Force and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1156; [2009] WLR (D) 317 </a></p>
<p>CA: Ward, Wilson, Leveson LJJ:<br />
5 November 2009</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><em>POLICE — Powers — Retention of seized property — Police investigating criminal proceedings and seizing and retaining property — Whether entitled to retain seized property where Crown Prosecution Service deciding not to prosecute but private prosecution being considered or taking place — Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, s 22(1)(2)(a)(i)(ii)</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/197/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=197&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/11/police-scopelight-ltd-and-others-v-chief-constable-of-northumbria-police-force-and-another-2009-ewca-civ-1156-2009-wlr-d-317-ca-ward-wilson-leveson-ljj-5-november-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Human Rights:  R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and another [2009] WLR (D) 316  QBD: Burton J: 28 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/human-rights-r-chester-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-and-another-2009-wlr-d-316-qbd-burton-j-28-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/human-rights-r-chester-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-and-another-2009-wlr-d-316-qbd-burton-j-28-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and another [2009] WLR (D) 316 QBD: Burton J: 28 October 2009 HUMAN RIGHTS — Right to free elections — Interference with — European Court of Human Rights and United Kingdom court finding United Kingdom legislation imposing blanket ban on prisoners’ right to vote incompatible with European [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=194&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/QBD/R(Chester)_v_SSJ.html" target="_blank">R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and another [2009] WLR (D) 316 </a></p>
<p>QBD: Burton J:<br />
28 October 2009</p>
<div><em>HUMAN RIGHTS — Right to free elections — Interference with — European Court of Human Rights and United Kingdom court finding United Kingdom legislation imposing blanket ban on prisoners’ right to vote incompatible with European Convention on Human Rights — United Kingdom government in process of laying proposals for change before parliament — Whether court entitled to exercise discretion to grant further declaration of incompatability — Human Rights Act 1998, s 3(1), Sch 1, Pt II, art 3</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/194/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=194&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/human-rights-r-chester-v-secretary-of-state-for-justice-and-another-2009-wlr-d-316-qbd-burton-j-28-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discrimination:  Grainger plc v Nicholson UKEAT/219/09; [2009] WLR (D) 315  EAT: Burton J: 3 November 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/discrimination-grainger-plc-v-nicholson-ukeat21909-2009-wlr-d-315-eat-burton-j-3-november-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/discrimination-grainger-plc-v-nicholson-ukeat21909-2009-wlr-d-315-eat-burton-j-3-november-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grainger plc v Nicholson UKEAT/219/09; [2009] WLR (D) 315 EAT: Burton J: 3 November 2009 DISCRIMINATION — Religion or belief — “Philosophical belief” — Belief in catastrophic climate change and duty to mitigate effect — Whether capable of being philosophical belief — Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI/2003/1660), regs 2, 3 (as amended [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=192&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/OTH/Grainger_v_Nicholson.html" target="_blank">Grainger plc v Nicholson UKEAT/219/09; [2009] WLR (D) 315 </a></p>
<p>EAT: Burton J:<br />
3 November 2009</p>
<div><em>DISCRIMINATION — Religion or belief — “Philosophical belief” — Belief in catastrophic climate change and duty to mitigate effect — Whether capable of being philosophical belief — Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI/2003/1660), regs 2, 3 (as amended by Equality Act 2006 (c 3), s 77)</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/192/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=192&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/discrimination-grainger-plc-v-nicholson-ukeat21909-2009-wlr-d-315-eat-burton-j-3-november-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discrimination:  EBR Attridge Law LLP and another v Coleman UKEAT/71/09; [2009] WLR (D) 314  EAT: Underhill J (President): 30 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/discrimination-ebr-attridge-law-llp-and-another-v-coleman-ukeat7109-2009-wlr-d-314-eat-underhill-j-president-30-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/discrimination-ebr-attridge-law-llp-and-another-v-coleman-ukeat7109-2009-wlr-d-314-eat-underhill-j-president-30-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EBR Attridge Law LLP and another v Coleman UKEAT/71/09; [2009] WLR (D) 314 EAT: Underhill J (President): 30 October 2009 DISCRIMINATION — Disability — Employee caring for disabled son — Claims against employer of direct discrimination and harassment on ground of disability — Whether prohibition of discrimination extending to non disabled employee — Disability Discrimination [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=190&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/OTH/EBRAttridgeLaw_v_Coleman.html" target="_blank">EBR Attridge Law LLP and another v Coleman UKEAT/71/09; [2009] WLR (D) 314</a></p>
<p>EAT: Underhill J (President):<br />
30 October 2009</p>
<div><em>DISCRIMINATION — Disability — Employee caring for disabled son — Claims against employer of direct discrimination and harassment on ground of disability — Whether prohibition of discrimination extending to non disabled employee — Disability Discrimination Act 1995, ss 3A, 3B (as inserted by Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (Amendment) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1673), reg 4)</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/190/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=190&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/discrimination-ebr-attridge-law-llp-and-another-v-coleman-ukeat7109-2009-wlr-d-314-eat-underhill-j-president-30-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Costs:  ENE Kos 1 Ltd v Petroleo Brasilieiro SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1127; [2009] WLR (D) 313  CA: Waller, Arden, Dyson LJJ: 30 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/costs-ene-kos-1-ltd-v-petroleo-brasilieiro-sa-2009-ewca-civ-1127-2009-wlr-d-313-ca-waller-arden-dyson-ljj-30-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/costs-ene-kos-1-ltd-v-petroleo-brasilieiro-sa-2009-ewca-civ-1127-2009-wlr-d-313-ca-waller-arden-dyson-ljj-30-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Costs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ENE Kos 1 Ltd v Petroleo Brasilieiro SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1127; [2009] WLR (D) 313 CA: Waller, Arden, Dyson LJJ: 30 October 2009 COSTS — Payment into court — Effective date of payment in when made by cheque — Defendant ordered to make payment in by certain date — Defendant paying foreign currency cheque [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=188&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/ENEKos_v_Petroleo.html" target="_blank">ENE Kos 1 Ltd v Petroleo Brasilieiro SA [2009] EWCA Civ 1127; [2009] WLR (D) 313 </a></p>
<p>CA: Waller, Arden, Dyson LJJ:<br />
30 October 2009</p>
<div><em>COSTS —  Payment into court —  Effective date of payment in when made by cheque —  Defendant ordered to make payment in by certain date —  Defendant paying foreign currency cheque into court funds office by required date —  Judge determining that order required cleared funds to be in court funds office by required time —  Whether effective date of payment in when cheque received in court office or when funds have cleared —  Whether difference if sterling cheque or foreign currency cheque —  Court Funds Rules 1987 ( SI 1987/821), r 16, 38</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/188/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=188&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/costs-ene-kos-1-ltd-v-petroleo-brasilieiro-sa-2009-ewca-civ-1127-2009-wlr-d-313-ca-waller-arden-dyson-ljj-30-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jersey:  Michel v The Queen [2009] UKPC 40; [2009] WLR (D) 312  PC: Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury: 4 November 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/jersey-michel-v-the-queen-2009-ukpc-40-2009-wlr-d-312-pc-lord-phillips-of-worth-matravers-lord-rodger-of-earlsferry-baroness-hale-of-richmond-lord-brown-of-eaton-under-heywood-lord-neub/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/jersey-michel-v-the-queen-2009-ukpc-40-2009-wlr-d-312-pc-lord-phillips-of-worth-matravers-lord-rodger-of-earlsferry-baroness-hale-of-richmond-lord-brown-of-eaton-under-heywood-lord-neub/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jersey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michel v The Queen [2009] UKPC 40; [2009] WLR (D) 312 PC: Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury: 4 November 2009 JERSEY — Crime — Judge — Bias — Criminal trial before judge and jurats — Judge constantly interrupting witnesses [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=186&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/HLPC/Michel_v_TheQueen.html" target="_blank">Michel v The Queen [2009] UKPC 40; [2009] WLR (D) 312 </a></p>
<p>PC: Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Baroness Hale of Richmond, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury: 4 November 2009</p>
<div><em>JERSEY — Crime — Judge — Bias — Criminal trial before judge and jurats — Judge constantly interrupting witnesses and indicating disbelief of defence case — Whether trial rendered unfair — Whether sufficient to lead to quashing of conviction despite overwhelming evidence against defendant</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/186/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=186&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/jersey-michel-v-the-queen-2009-ukpc-40-2009-wlr-d-312-pc-lord-phillips-of-worth-matravers-lord-rodger-of-earlsferry-baroness-hale-of-richmond-lord-brown-of-eaton-under-heywood-lord-neub/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practice:  BTA Bank JSC v Ablyazov and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1958; [2009] WLR (D) 311  CA: Pill, Sedley, Moses LJJ: 27 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/practice-bta-bank-jsc-v-ablyazov-and-others-2009-ewca-civ-1958-2009-wlr-d-311-ca-pill-sedley-moses-ljj-27-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/practice-bta-bank-jsc-v-ablyazov-and-others-2009-ewca-civ-1958-2009-wlr-d-311-ca-pill-sedley-moses-ljj-27-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Practice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BTA Bank JSC v Ablyazov and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1958; [2009] WLR (D) 311 CA: Pill, Sedley, Moses LJJ: 27 October 2009 PRACTICE — Discovery — Privilege against self-incrimination — Arrangement facilitating the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property — Whether “any other offence involving any form of fraudulent conduct or purpose” [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=183&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTA Bank JSC v Ablyazov and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1958; [2009] WLR (D) 311</p>
<p>CA: Pill, Sedley, Moses LJJ:<br />
27 October 2009</p>
<div><em>PRACTICE — Discovery — Privilege against self-incrimination — Arrangement facilitating the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property — Whether “any other offence involving any form of fraudulent conduct or purpose” — Whether defendant entitled to rely on privilege against self-incrimination — Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, s 328 — Fraud Act 2006, s 13(4)(b)</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/183/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=183&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/practice-bta-bank-jsc-v-ablyazov-and-others-2009-ewca-civ-1958-2009-wlr-d-311-ca-pill-sedley-moses-ljj-27-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confidential InformatioN:  Regina (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Secretary of State for the Home Department and another intervening) [2009] UKSC 3; [2009] WLR (D) 310 Supreme Court: Lord Hope of Craighead, Deputy President, Lord Saville of Newdigate, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury: 29 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/confidential-information-regina-l-v-commissioner-of-police-of-the-metropolis-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-and-another-intervening-2009-uksc-3-2009-wlr-d-310-supreme-court-l/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/confidential-information-regina-l-v-commissioner-of-police-of-the-metropolis-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-and-another-intervening-2009-uksc-3-2009-wlr-d-310-supreme-court-l/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Confidential Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regina (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Secretary of State for the Home Department and another intervening) [2009] UKSC 3; [2009] WLR (D) 310 Supreme Court: Lord Hope of Craighead, Deputy President, Lord Saville of Newdigate, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury: 29 October 2009 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=181&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/HLPC/R(L)_v_ComrPoliceMetro(SC).html" target="_blank">Regina (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Secretary of State for the Home Department and another intervening) [2009] UKSC 3; [2009] WLR (D) 310</a></div>
<div></div>
<div>Supreme Court: Lord Hope of Craighead, Deputy President, Lord Saville of Newdigate, Lord Scott of Foscote, Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury: 29 October 2009</div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div><em>CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION — Disclosure — Police — Enhanced criminal record certificate — Duty of chief police officer to disclose information — Whether limited to disclosing information about criminal activity — Whether breach of right to respect for private life — Police Act 1997, s 115 — Human Rights Act 1998, Sch 1, Pt I, art 8</em></div>
</div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/181/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=181&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/confidential-information-regina-l-v-commissioner-of-police-of-the-metropolis-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-and-another-intervening-2009-uksc-3-2009-wlr-d-310-supreme-court-l/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practice:  Earles v Barclays Bank plc [2009] EWHC 2500 (Mercantile); [2009] WLR (D) 309  QBD (Birmingham): Judge Simon Brown QC: 8 Oct 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/practice-earles-v-barclays-bank-plc-2009-ewhc-2500-mercantile-2009-wlr-d-309-qbd-birmingham-judge-simon-brown-qc-8-oct-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/practice-earles-v-barclays-bank-plc-2009-ewhc-2500-mercantile-2009-wlr-d-309-qbd-birmingham-judge-simon-brown-qc-8-oct-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earles v Barclays Bank plc [2009] EWHC 2500 (Mercantile); [2009] WLR (D) 309 QBD (Birmingham): Judge Simon Brown QC: 8 Oct 2009 PRACTICE — Discovery — Electronically stored information — Resolving issues of primary fact — Obligation to preserve key contemporaneous commercial documents — Whether failure to do so to be reflected in costs — [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=179&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/QBD/Earles_v_Barclays.html" target="_blank">Earles v Barclays Bank plc [2009] EWHC 2500 (Mercantile); [2009] WLR (D) 309 </a></p>
<p>QBD (Birmingham): Judge Simon Brown QC:<br />
8 Oct 2009</p>
<div><em>PRACTICE — Discovery — Electronically stored information — Resolving issues of primary fact — Obligation to preserve key contemporaneous commercial documents  — Whether failure to do so to be reflected in costs — CPR rr 31.4, 31.6, 44.3</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/179/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=179&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/practice-earles-v-barclays-bank-plc-2009-ewhc-2500-mercantile-2009-wlr-d-309-qbd-birmingham-judge-simon-brown-qc-8-oct-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademark:  Ferrero SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case T-140/08); [2009] WLR (D) 308  CFI: I Pelikánová, President, K Jürimäe (Rapporteur) and S Soldevila Fragoso, Judges: 14 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/trademark-ferrero-spa-v-office-for-harmonisation-in-the-internal-market-trade-marks-and-designs-ohim-case-t-14008-2009-wlr-d-308-cfi-i-pelikanova-president-k-jurimae-rapporteur-and/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/trademark-ferrero-spa-v-office-for-harmonisation-in-the-internal-market-trade-marks-and-designs-ohim-case-t-14008-2009-wlr-d-308-cfi-i-pelikanova-president-k-jurimae-rapporteur-and/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ferrero SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case T-140/08); [2009] WLR (D) 308 CFI: I Pelikánová, President, K Jürimäe (Rapporteur) and S Soldevila Fragoso, Judges: 14 October 2009 TRADE mark — Registration — Invalidity — Community trade mark registered after final decision rejecting opponent’s objections — Opponent [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=177&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ferrero SpA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Case T-140/08); [2009] WLR (D) 308</p>
<p>CFI: I Pelikánová, President, K Jürimäe (Rapporteur) and S Soldevila Fragoso, Judges:</p>
<p>14 October 2009</p>
<div><em>TRADE mark — Registration — Invalidity — Community trade mark registered after final decision rejecting opponent’s objections — Opponent subsequently seeking declaration of invalidity of mark — Whether Cancellation Division bound by earlier decisions of Opposition Division — Whether doctrine of res judicata applicable — Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94, arts 52(4), 96(2)</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/177/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=177&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/trademark-ferrero-spa-v-office-for-harmonisation-in-the-internal-market-trade-marks-and-designs-ohim-case-t-14008-2009-wlr-d-308-cfi-i-pelikanova-president-k-jurimae-rapporteur-and/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insolvency:  4 Eng Ltd v Harper and others (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2633 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 307  Ch D: Sales J : 26 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/insolvency-4-eng-ltd-v-harper-and-others-no-2-2009-ewhc-2633-ch-2009-wlr-d-307-ch-d-sales-j-26-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/insolvency-4-eng-ltd-v-harper-and-others-no-2-2009-ewhc-2633-ch-2009-wlr-d-307-ch-d-sales-j-26-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insolvency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4 Eng Ltd v Harper and others (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2633 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 307 Ch D: Sales J : 26 October 2009 INSOLVENCY — Transaction at an undervalue — Purpose of transaction — Claim by company to set aside transaction to realise assets to meet award of damages in its favour — [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=174&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CHAN/4_eng_v_harper.htm" target="_blank">4 Eng Ltd v Harper and others (No 2) [2009] EWHC 2633 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 307 </a></p>
<p>Ch D: Sales J :<br />
26 October 2009</p>
<div><em>INSOLVENCY —  Transaction at an undervalue —  Purpose of transaction —  Claim by company to set aside transaction to realise assets to meet award of damages in its favour —  Nature of order and extent of relief to be granted by court —  Whether mental state of defendant relevant  — Insolvency Act 1986, ss 423(2), 425</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/174/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=174&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/insolvency-4-eng-ltd-v-harper-and-others-no-2-2009-ewhc-2633-ch-2009-wlr-d-307-ch-d-sales-j-26-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract:  Joseph and others v Spiller and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1075; [2009] WLR (D) 306  CA: Pill, Hooper, Wilson LJJ : 22 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/contract-joseph-and-others-v-spiller-and-another-2009-ewca-civ-1075-2009-wlr-d-306-ca-pill-hooper-wilson-ljj-22-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/contract-joseph-and-others-v-spiller-and-another-2009-ewca-civ-1075-2009-wlr-d-306-ca-pill-hooper-wilson-ljj-22-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joseph and others v Spiller and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1075; [2009] WLR (D) 306 CA: Pill, Hooper, Wilson LJJ : 22 October 2009 CONTRACT — Illegality — Enforceability — Restrictive term contained in separate document to principal contract — Whether term or contract as a whole unenforceable by reason of breach of legislation — [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=172&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/joseph_v_spiller.html" target="_blank">Joseph and others v Spiller and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1075; [2009] WLR (D) 306 </a></p>
<p>CA: Pill, Hooper, Wilson LJJ :<br />
22 October 2009</p>
<div><em>CONTRACT — Illegality — Enforceability — Restrictive term contained in separate document to principal contract — Whether term or contract as a whole unenforceable by reason of breach of legislation —  Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Business Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/3319), reg 14(2)</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/172/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=172&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/contract-joseph-and-others-v-spiller-and-another-2009-ewca-civ-1075-2009-wlr-d-306-ca-pill-hooper-wilson-ljj-22-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tort:  Hunt v AB [2009] EWCA Civ 1092; [2009] WLR (D) 305  CA: Sedley, Wall, Moore-Bick LJJ: 22 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/tort-hunt-v-ab-2009-ewca-civ-1092-2009-wlr-d-305-ca-sedley-wall-moore-bick-ljj-22-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/tort-hunt-v-ab-2009-ewca-civ-1092-2009-wlr-d-305-ca-sedley-wall-moore-bick-ljj-22-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tort]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hunt v AB [2009] EWCA Civ 1092; [2009] WLR (D) 305 CA: Sedley, Wall, Moore-Bick LJJ: 22 October 2009 TORT — Cause of action — Malicious prosecution — Complainant alleging rape — Accused prosecuted by CPS but eventually acquitted — Whether complainant liable as prosecutor in criminal proceedings<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=170&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/Hunt_v_AB.html" target="_blank"><strong>Hunt v AB [2009] EWCA Civ 1092; [2009] WLR (D) 305</strong></a></p>
<p>CA: Sedley, Wall, Moore-Bick LJJ:<br />
22 October 2009</p>
<div><em>TORT —  Cause of action —  Malicious prosecution —  Complainant alleging rape —  Accused prosecuted by CPS but eventually acquitted —  Whether complainant liable as prosecutor in criminal proceedings</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/170/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=170&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/tort-hunt-v-ab-2009-ewca-civ-1092-2009-wlr-d-305-ca-sedley-wall-moore-bick-ljj-22-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planning:  R (Boggis) and another v Natural England [2009] EWCA Civ 1061; [2009] WLR (D) 304  CA: Mummery, Longmore, Sullivan LJJ: 20 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/planning-r-boggis-and-another-v-natural-england-2009-ewca-civ-1061-2009-wlr-d-304-ca-mummery-longmore-sullivan-ljj-20-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/planning-r-boggis-and-another-v-natural-england-2009-ewca-civ-1061-2009-wlr-d-304-ca-mummery-longmore-sullivan-ljj-20-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R (Boggis) and another v Natural England [2009] EWCA Civ 1061; [2009] WLR (D) 304 CA: Mummery, Longmore, Sullivan LJJ: 20 October 2009 PLANNING — Protection — Site of special scientific interest — Notification and confirmation of area of land as site of special scientific interest — Whether constituting “plan” or “project” to be assessed [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=168&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/R_v_Natural_England.html" target="_blank"><strong>R (Boggis) and another v Natural England [2009] EWCA Civ 1061; [2009] WLR (D) 304 </strong></a></p>
<p>CA: Mummery, Longmore, Sullivan LJJ:<br />
20 October 2009</p>
<div><em>PLANNING — Protection — Site of special scientific interest —  Notification and confirmation of area of land as site of special scientific interest  — Whether constituting “plan” or “project” to be assessed pursuant to Directive —  Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, s 28 —  Council Directive 92/43/EC, art 6(3)</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/168/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=168&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/planning-r-boggis-and-another-v-natural-england-2009-ewca-civ-1061-2009-wlr-d-304-ca-mummery-longmore-sullivan-ljj-20-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crime:  R v Ghulam ; [2009] WLR (D) 303  CA: Stanley Burnton LJ, Penry-Davey J, Sharpe J: 21 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/crime-r-v-ghulam-2009-wlr-d-303-ca-stanley-burnton-lj-penry-davey-j-sharpe-j-21-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/crime-r-v-ghulam-2009-wlr-d-303-ca-stanley-burnton-lj-penry-davey-j-sharpe-j-21-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[R v Ghulam ; [2009] WLR (D) 303 CA: Stanley Burnton LJ, Penry-Davey J, Sharpe J: 21 October 2009 &#160; CRIME — Plea — Fitness to plead — Insanity — Evidence of only one registered medical practitioner put forward — Whether trial judge bound to adjourn trial to enable evidence from second registered medical practitioner [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=166&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACrim/R_v_Ghulam.html" target="_blank">R v Ghulam ; [2009] WLR (D) 303</a></strong></p>
<p>CA: Stanley Burnton LJ, Penry-Davey J, Sharpe J:<br />
21 October 2009</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div><em>CRIME — Plea —  Fitness to plead — Insanity — Evidence of only one registered medical practitioner put forward —  Whether trial judge bound to adjourn trial to enable evidence from second registered medical practitioner to be sought —  Whether trial judge could properly find defendant fit to plead — Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964, s 4(6)</em></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/166/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=166&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/27/crime-r-v-ghulam-2009-wlr-d-303-ca-stanley-burnton-lj-penry-davey-j-sharpe-j-21-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data protection:  Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1079; [2009] WLR (D) 302  CA: Waller, Carnwath, Hughes LJJ: 19 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/data-protection-chief-constable-of-humberside-police-and-others-v-information-commissioner-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-intervening-2009-ewca-civ-1079-2009-wlr-d-302-ca-wall/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/data-protection-chief-constable-of-humberside-police-and-others-v-information-commissioner-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-intervening-2009-ewca-civ-1079-2009-wlr-d-302-ca-wall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Data Protection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1079; [2009] WLR (D) 302 CA: Waller, Carnwath, Hughes LJJ: 19 October 2009 DATA PROTECTION — Police — Records of convictions — Police retaining old minor convictions on national computer — Information commissioner issuing [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=163&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/CCHumbersidePolice_v_InfoComnr.html" target="_blank">Chief Constable of Humberside Police and others v Information Commissioner (Secretary of State for the Home Department intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1079; [2009] WLR (D) 302 </a></p>
<p>CA: Waller, Carnwath, Hughes LJJ:<br />
19 October 2009</p>
<div style="margin-right:0;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-style:italic;line-height:1.1;margin-top:8pt;font-size:11pt;margin-left:0;text-indent:0;text-align:left;"><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;">DATA PROTECTION</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Police</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Records of convictions</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Police retaining old minor convictions on national computer</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Information commissioner issuing enforcement notices to compel deletion</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Information tribunal ruling that retained information infringing data protection principles and ordering deletion</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Whether excessive data being retained</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Whether data kept longer than necessary</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Data Protection Act 1998, Sch 1, Pt I</span></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/163/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=163&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/data-protection-chief-constable-of-humberside-police-and-others-v-information-commissioner-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-intervening-2009-ewca-civ-1079-2009-wlr-d-302-ca-wall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing:  Birmingham City Council v Qasim and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1080; [2009] WLR (D) 301  CA: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Sedley LJ, Owen J: 20 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/housing-birmingham-city-council-v-qasim-and-others-2009-ewca-civ-1080-2009-wlr-d-301-ca-lord-neuberger-of-abbotsbury-mr-sedley-lj-owen-j-20-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/housing-birmingham-city-council-v-qasim-and-others-2009-ewca-civ-1080-2009-wlr-d-301-ca-lord-neuberger-of-abbotsbury-mr-sedley-lj-owen-j-20-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Birmingham City Council v Qasim and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1080; [2009] WLR (D) 301 CA: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Sedley LJ, Owen J: 20 October 2009 HOUSING — Secure tenancy — Claim for possession — Grant of tenancy by council official in breach of local authority’s statutory allocation scheme — Claim for possession [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=161&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Birmingham City Council v Qasim and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1080; [2009] WLR (D) 301</p>
<p>CA: Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Sedley LJ, Owen J:<br />
20 October 2009</p>
<div style="margin-right:0;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-style:italic;line-height:1.1;margin-top:8pt;font-size:11pt;margin-left:0;text-indent:0;text-align:left;"><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;">HOUSING</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Secure tenancy </span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Claim for possession </span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Grant of tenancy by council official in breach of local authority’s statutory allocation scheme </span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Claim for possession on ground tenancy void </span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Whether entitled to order for possession </span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Housing Act 1985, Pt II, s 32 </span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Housing Act 1996, Pt VI, ss 159, 167(8)</span></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/161/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=161&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/housing-birmingham-city-council-v-qasim-and-others-2009-ewca-civ-1080-2009-wlr-d-301-ca-lord-neuberger-of-abbotsbury-mr-sedley-lj-owen-j-20-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discrimination:  Wilson v Health and Safety Executive (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1074; [2009] WLR (D) 300  CA: Sedley, Arden, Rimer LJJ: 20 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/discrimination-wilson-v-health-and-safety-executive-equality-and-human-rights-commission-intervening-2009-ewca-civ-1074-2009-wlr-d-300-ca-sedley-arden-rimer-ljj-20-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/discrimination-wilson-v-health-and-safety-executive-equality-and-human-rights-commission-intervening-2009-ewca-civ-1074-2009-wlr-d-300-ca-sedley-arden-rimer-ljj-20-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wilson v Health and Safety Executive (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1074; [2009] WLR (D) 300 CA: Sedley, Arden, Rimer LJJ: 20 October 2009 DISCRIMINATION — Sex — Equal pay — Variation due to material difference — Claimant paid less than male comparators — Length of service reason for differential — [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=159&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/CACiv/Wilson_v_HSExecutive.html" target="_blank">Wilson v Health and Safety Executive (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2009] EWCA Civ 1074; [2009] WLR (D) 300 </a></p>
<p>CA: Sedley, Arden, Rimer LJJ:<br />
20 October 2009</p>
<div style="margin-right:0;font-family:'Times New Roman';font-style:italic;line-height:1.1;margin-top:8pt;font-size:11pt;margin-left:0;text-indent:0;text-align:left;"><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;">DISCRIMINATION</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Sex</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Equal pay</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Variation due to material difference</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Claimant paid less than male comparators</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Length of service reason for differential</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Employer applying length of service criterion</span><span style="margin-left:0;margin-right:0;text-indent:0;margin-top:8pt;"> <span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">—</span> Whether required to justify period of application</span></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/insitelawreports.wordpress.com/159/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=insitelawreports.wordpress.com&amp;blog=8735674&amp;post=159&amp;subd=insitelawreports&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://insitelawreports.wordpress.com/2009/10/22/discrimination-wilson-v-health-and-safety-executive-equality-and-human-rights-commission-intervening-2009-ewca-civ-1074-2009-wlr-d-300-ca-sedley-arden-rimer-ljj-20-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">charonqc</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
